O Futuro da Gestão de Risco Financeiro

Kodak’s fate
To a greater extent than other mathematical disciplines, statistics is a product of its time. If Francis Galton, Karl Pearson, Ronald Fisher, and Jerzy Neyman had had access to computers, they may have created an entirely different field. Classical statistics relies on simplistic assumptions (linearity, independence), in-sample analysis, analytical solutions, and asymptotic properties partly because its founders had access to limited computing power. Today, many of these legacy methods continue to be taught at university courses and in professional certification programs, even though computational methods, such as cross-validation, ensemble estimators, regularization, bootstrapping, and Monte Carlo, deliver demonstrably better solutions.
Financial problems pose a particular challenge to those legacy methods, because economic systems exhibit a degree of complexity that is beyond the grasp of classical statistical tools. As a consequence, machine learning (ML) plays an increasingly important role in finance. Only a few years ago, it was rare to find ML applications outside short-term price prediction, trade execution, and setting of credit ratings. Today, it is hard to find a use case where ML is not being deployed in some form. This trend is unlikely to change, as larger data sets, greater computing power, and more efficient algorithms all conspire to unleash a golden age of financial ML. The ML revolution creates opportunities for dynamic firms and challenges for antiquated asset managers.
Firms that resist this revolution will likely share Kodak’s fate.
Marcos M. López de Prado, “Machine Learning for Asset Managers (Elements in Quantitative Finance)”, Publisher: Cambridge University Press, April 30, 2020.
Conforme Michael B. Miller (“Quantitative Financial Risk Management", Wiley Finance Series, 2019)
Despite tremendous growth in recent years, financial risk management is still a young discipline. We can expect to see many changes in the roles of financial risk managers in the coming years.
The financial crisis of 2008 called into question some quantitative risk models, but it also caused many to argue for a greater role for risk managers within financial firms. While there were certainly instances when models were used incorrectly, the far greater problem was that the decision makers at large financial firms either never received the data they needed, didn’t understand it, or chose to ignore it. It was not so much that we lacked the tools to properly assess risk, as it was that the tools were not being used or that the people using the tools were not being listened to.
As risk management continues to gain wider acceptance, the role of risk managers in communicating with investors and regulators will continue to grow. We are also likely to see an increasingly integrated approach to risk management and performance analysis, which are now treated as separate activities by most financial firms.
There are still important areas of risk management, such as liquidity risk, where widely accepted models and standards have yet to be developed. If history is any guide, financial markets will continue to grow in breadth, speed, and complexity. Along with this growth will come new challenges for risk managers.
The future of risk management is very bright.

O Futuro das Finanças e da Análise de Risco
Conforme Marcos Lopez de Prado (M. L. de Prado, “Advances in Financial Machine Learning”, 1st Edition, Wiley, 2018):